Call a real personal injury trial lawyer (404) 939-4525


FDA approval process for medical devices criticized

Posted by John Hadden | Jan 03, 2010 | 0 Comments

The Food and Drug Administration's approval process for medical devices such as pacemakers and implanted defibrillators has come under fire for failing to adequately consider the safety of such devices. Reporting on a study first published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, the Los Angeles Times observed that cardiovascular devices "are not subjected to rigorous safety and effectiveness research before being approved for use."

These findings are all the more troubling in light of the US Supreme Court's 2008 decision in Riegel v. Medtronic providing immunity from civil lawsuits to manufacturers of such products that are approved by the FDA. In its opinion, the Supreme Court reasoned that the FDA approval process was "rigorous" and thus precluded claims against the manufacturer by those injured by its products. With serious questions now being raised about that approval process, the justification for this decision are now in serious doubt. Unfortunately, patients who receive these devices have little recourse at this time for injuries caused by these defective products, although the Medical Device Patient Safety Act of 2009 pending in the House of Representatives (and supported by the New England Journal of Medicine) offers some hope that the injustice created by this decision can be reversed.

About the Author

John Hadden

John D. Hadden is the owner and founder of the Hadden Law Firm. An experienced trial and appellate lawyer, he is author of three respected treatises on Georgia litigation practice: Greens Georgia Law of Evidence, Georgia Law of Torts - Trial Preparation and Practice, and Georgia Magistrate Court...


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Featured Testimonial

"Working with John was my first experience with the legal system. John explained everything thoroughly to me and helped me weigh the pros and cons of each potential decision. He was readily available whenever I had a question or a concern about my case. I would highly recommend John to anyone in need of legal representation. He is professional yet still very down to earth.”
– Courtney
Nav Map


Nav Map