Call a real personal injury trial lawyer (404) 939-4525


John Hadden's book cited by Georgia Supreme Court

Posted by John Hadden | Jun 25, 2014 | 0 Comments

Last week, The Georgia Supreme Court cited and quoted from Georgia Law of Torts - Trial Preparation and Practice in its unanimous decision in Hartley v. Agnes Scott College (link) , authored by Justice David Nahmias. The case involved claims against the private college and three campus police officers for false arrest, false imprisonment, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The defendants sought to have the case dismissed, arguing that the Georgia Tort Claims Act (GTCA) was applicable and provided immunity for the claims. The trial court denied the motion, but the Georgia Court of Appeals reversed, finding that the officers qualified as "state officers or employees" within the meaning of the GTCA and were therefore entitled to immunity. In last week's decision, the Supreme Court disagreed, finding that a private campus security force did not fall under the GTCA and therefore the immunity claims were without merit.

Georgia Law of Torts - Trial Preparation and Practice is published by Thomson Reuters Westlaw and authored by John Hadden and Kenneth Shigley. In support of its decision, the Supreme Court cited Chapter 17, which provides a comprehensive review and analysis of sovereign immunity issues in Georgia, including claims brought under the Georgia Tort Claims Act.

About the Author

John Hadden

John D. Hadden is the owner and founder of the Hadden Law Firm. An experienced trial and appellate lawyer, he is author of three respected treatises on Georgia litigation practice: Greens Georgia Law of Evidence, Georgia Law of Torts - Trial Preparation and Practice, and Georgia Magistrate Court...


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Featured Testimonial

"Working with John was my first experience with the legal system. John explained everything thoroughly to me and helped me weigh the pros and cons of each potential decision. He was readily available whenever I had a question or a concern about my case. I would highly recommend John to anyone in need of legal representation. He is professional yet still very down to earth.”
– Courtney
Nav Map


Nav Map